Policy action called for to prevent gambling harm

Glasgow University Media release covering work by Prof Robert Rogers, School of Psychology

Academics are calling for a radical overhaul of the UK gambling laws including a tax on the industry to prevent gambling harms and support those with gambling problems, in a paper published today (Thursday 9 May 2019).

As gambling is increasingly being recognised as a public health issue, the academies say major investment is needed to alleviate the growing economic burden on society.

A paper - Gambling and public health: we need policy action to prevent harm (link here to the paper)- published today in the BMJ says the extent and cost of gambling has been significantly underestimated in Britain.

In 2017/18, less than 拢1.5m was spent on prevention activity in Britain, for a population of 65 million. In contrast, New Zealand has an annual budget of over 拢9.3m for prevention for a population of 4.7 million. The academics 鈥� from England, Scotland, Wales and Australia, say there is no government-owned strategy for preventing gambling harm and there is a critical need to increase the level of funding available for prevention if harms are to be reduced.

They are calling for three main policy and funding changes including:

  • Revise the 2005 Gambling Act
  • Enact a compulsory levy on industry to generate funds
  • Shift responsibility for gambling from the Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport to the Department of Health and Social Care

 

 

The paper says: 鈥淕ambling encompasses a broad range of activities ranging from the National Lottery to casino games, slot machines and online betting. Around 58% of adults in Great Britain gambled on at least one of these activities in the past year.鈥�

According to the paper there are now 33 million active online gambling accounts in Britain. While the prevalence of online gambling has increased from less than 1% in 1999 to 9% in 2016. The paper also points out that 14% of children aged 11-16 have gambled in the past week, with around 55,000 reporting problems from their gambling behaviour.

, Assistant Professor at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, the paper鈥檚 lead author, said: 鈥淕ambling harms have been vastly underestimated. It is placing major burdens on resources, relationships and health.

鈥淭he time now is for action to reduce harms which is going to require a much more significant level of funding than is currently available. We believe that a compulsory levy on industry is the only way to achieve this.鈥�

, the University of Glasgow鈥檚 Professor of Social Sciences and an author on the paper, said: 鈥淎s a society we need to face up to the broad environment that gambling harm is produced  in 鈥� the role of the industry, as well as the policy climate that they operate in .

鈥淕ambling doesn鈥檛 just affect an individual. The impacts ripple out beyond them to  their family, friends, communities and society.

 鈥淣ot only does this have major implications for our health services but is also a social justice issue.  Gambling harms disproportionately affect poorer or  more  vulnerable groups in ways that can exacerbate existing inequalities. We urgently need a marked change in approach, and one that is long overdue.鈥�

Gambling is associated with wide ranging harms that go beyond individuals to harm families, communities and societies. These effects include financial problems, relationship breakdowns, abuse or neglect of partners and children and adverse childhood experiences that disturb relationships and educational progress & learning.

In Australia for example, the burden of these harms caused on the health and wellbeing is estimated to be of a similar magnitude to major depressive disorders or alcohol misuse and dependence.

In Britain, conservative estimates of social costs range from between 拢200m and 拢1.2bn a year which the paper says is 鈥渓ikely to be considerable underestimates.

It costs societies more to not address gambling harms than to do so. In Victoria, Australia, tax revenue from gambling is $AUS 1.6 billion; social costs are $AUS 6.97 billion - a net deficit of $AUS 5.4 billion

Publication date: 9 May 2019